Talk:Fluorine cycle

Kelsey's Peer Review

lead section

Though only a sentence, the lead section provides a broad overview of what the Fluorine Cycle is and why it is so important to our environment. The rest of the article, then, goes more in depth through each sphere mentioned. It could potentially be expanded to include more of the content in the Fluorine distribution section, but right now it does a great job of conveying the importance of the cycle with clear and concise language.

clear structure

As of right now, the structure of the article is very easy to follow. Understanding where the vast majority of the Fluorine is in the Earth to further understand how the element cycles through our world is important to orient readers.

balanced coverage

Right now as the draft stands, the Fluorine distribution section is developed the most out of all of the sections, but I'm sure that with more continued drafting each section's length will equal the importance to the subject. The content is also presented in a way that reflects the peer-reviewed scientific concepts in a clear and neutral tone, with the sources clearly marked where appropriate.

neutral content

The author presents the information in a very neutral way--letting the science do the talking instead of an individual. There is no language that reflects any opinion other than the facts. Good job!

reliable sources

All of the references listed come from well-respected journals, such as Global Biogeochemical Cycles and Applied Geochemistry. The statements in the article are all connected to a reliable source, and cited as such. There is no unsourced statements in the article.

figure

The link to the figure does not seem to be working currently--Wikipedia says that it was deleted or moved. Therefore, I can't comment on the quality, neatness, nor the caption.

Overall, this is a great start to a great article! I'm very excited to see how this article develops. Great job! Kabernathy9 (talk)

Image

Hi Jmckaig, the image you provided is perfectly suited to the article, but I would ask you to handle its storage and inclusion differently. Instead of uploading it locally to Wikipedia, please upload it to Wikimedia Commons, using their Upload Wizard. This way it is available for all Wikipedia language versions, and handling is a lot smoother. Well over 99% of images on WP are handled that way. The process should be very similar to what you used here. You will then receive a link to the file that you can use to include it in this article, using the syntax "[File: imagename | thumb | legend]". Cheers! --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:33, 17 April 2021 (UTC)