Talk:Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Case name[edit]

I am thinking of moving this article to Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., which is how the case is usually cited and referred to. Any thoughts? Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Flagging this again for any input. Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There having been no objections (or interest at all), I've gone ahead and made the move, leaving a redirect. Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:27, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not As Clear as Old Man Down the Road page[edit]

The page on the song, The Old Man Down the Road, is so succinct and clear, as it contains the passage,

"This case, Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., became precedent when the U.S. Supreme Court (1993) overturned lower court rulings and awarded attorneys' fees to Fogerty, without Fogerty having to show that Zaentz's original suit was frivolous."

This page, Fogerty vs. Fantasy, is longer but does it even directly state that Fogerty was awarded attorneys' fees? I read the whole thing twice and I don't think it does! tharsaile (talk) 14:15, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]