Talk:Forbes Korea Power Celebrity 40

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright issue- January 2016[edit]

There appears to be a confusion as to whether this list falls under fair use. The consensus on other Forbes lists talk pages seems to be that having a part of the list (usually the top 10) falls under fair use, while publishing the entire list does not. Therefore, I suggest that someone edit down each of the respective years lists to only the top 10 to make sure that this falls under fair use.Fireflyfanboy (talk) 21:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Section ordering[edit]

Do people really read the sections in year descending order? User cites the following pattern on Forbes articles like Forbes list of The World's 100 Most Powerful Women, but it isn't used everywhere like Forbes Celebrity 100. And we don't typically write article text in chronological descending order nor other tables this way? WP:SALORDER guidelines says to use "earliest-to-latest chronological order". Evaders99 (talk) 17:18, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism[edit]

someone edited the 2019 forbes korea power celebrity to include twice's name and remove blackpink's while flipping the position of 1 and 2. can someone fix this?

Done. It's been reverted. Evaders99 (talk) 23:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

This article is getting vandalised and BTS' name has been removed from all the lists. Plpm2021 (talk) 03:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done: I have reverted their edits. -ink&fables «talk» 06:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

People expect to see Forbes Korea Power Celebrity 40, not just top 10 in this article[edit]

When people search for Forbes Korea Power Celebrity 40, they expect to see the whole list of 40 celebs, not just top 10. These 40 celebs are just as important as the top 10 and they should be listed here as they are listed on the Forbes Korea magazine. As you can see, I have not removed any of top 10 lists, I've just added the top 40 list for 2023.

I've changed profession titles from 'boy band' to 'boy group' as there's no real bands here just like girl group. I also changed 'footballer' to 'soccer player'

Lastly I want to re-organize the article by moving recent years to the top so that people can find the new lists easily and no need to scrolling all the way down.

샘킴 (talk) 01:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not Wikipedia's purpose to provide a copy of the list. Rather the article should be why it is notable. In fact, it is probably a copyright violation of Forbes. A further cut down list has been discussed under fair use in the US and this article implements this precedent. Evaders99 (talk) 04:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The list should be rearranged to reverse chronological order as most people are interested in seeing new and updated lists, not the 2009 list on the top.

Example: Forbes list of the World's 100 Most Powerful Women 샘킴 (talk) 17:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also all pictures should be removed from this article as recent year lists are not updated with pictures. 샘킴 (talk) 17:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]