Talk:Force Design 2030
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Potential sources[edit]
Some non-USMC sources.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] I haven't looked in to the reputations for each of these sources, but on quick glance they look reputable, and indicate that there are public concerns and criticisms of the plan that should be addressed in the article.
In addition, there was a special supplement this month to the Marine Corps Gazette, titled "Force Design 2030: The Ongoing Debate", which is available via ProQuest (Wikipedia library). It appears to have some interesting analysis. This is one of the articles in it.[8]
Schazjmd (talk) 01:06, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ Marletto, Michael P. (November 6, 2022). "Force Design 2030: Transforming to Irrelevance". The National Interest. Retrieved December 6, 2022.
- ^ "Marine Corps Force Design 2030: Examining the Capabilities and Critiques". Center for Strategic and International Studies. May 9, 2022. Retrieved December 6, 2022.
- ^ "Marines Update Force Design 2030 After a Year of Experimentation in the Field". USNI News. April 26, 2021. Retrieved December 6, 2022.
- ^ Means, Other (July 24, 2021). "USMC Force Design 2030: US Marines and the Indo-Pacific". The Diplomat. Retrieved December 6, 2022.
- ^ Cancian, Mark (June 14, 2022). "Analyzing the biggest changes in the Marine Corps Force Design 2030 update". Breaking Defense. Retrieved December 6, 2022.
- ^ "MARSOC and Force Design 2030". SOF News. March 27, 2020. Retrieved December 6, 2022.
- ^ Forsling, Carl (November 25, 2020). "The Commandant of the Marine Corps is charging into the future, but some aren't ready for change". Task & Purpose. Retrieved December 6, 2022.
- ^ Livingston, James; Vargas, Jay (December 2022). "The Battle of Dai Do and Marine Corps Force Design 2030". Marine Corps Gazette, Special Edition: Force Design 2030 the Ongoing Debate. Vol. 106, no. 12. pp. 111–113. ProQuest 2741038753.
Criticism[edit]
Why is there no “Criticism” section? The decision to remove all tanks seems especially polarising. 197.234.165.147 (talk) 18:09, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- When I think about the events in Ukraine, I'd be even more concerned about dumping the gun artillery. Jdougan (talk) 05:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
this article reads like an ad for the United States Marines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alacard (talk • contribs) 04:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)