Talk:Ford Strikers Riot

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Photography: History

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of photography.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Economics

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Organized Labour

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

A fact from Ford Strikers Riot appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 March 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Pulitzer jury said that Ford Strikers Riot (pictured) is "a brutal picture, it sums up much of the labor history of 1941"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ford Strikers Riot.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst talk 18:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Ford Strikers Riot

... that in 1942 Ford Strikers Riot (pictured) won the first Pulitzer Prize for Photography? Source: The first Pulitzer for photography would be awarded to Milton Brooks of the Detroit News in 1942—for his image of UAW strikers savagely beating a strikebreaker.
- ALT1: ... that the Pulitzer jury said Ford Strikers Riot (pictured) is "a brutal picture, it sums up much of the labor history of 1941"? Source: a brutal picture, it sums up much of the labor history of 1941
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/List of WNBA seasons

Moved to mainspace by Bruxton (talk). Self-nominated at 16:37, 30 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ford Strikers Riot; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Almost a slam-dunk. I would just suggest "that the Fort Strikers Riot (pictured) won the first Pulitzer Prize for Photography in 1942?" –♠Vamí _IV†♠ 20:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vami IV: Thank you for the review. I am ok with the tweak suggestion. I usually leave it to the promotors and prep set gleaners. Bruxton (talk) 20:21, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

–♠Vamí _IV†♠ 21:53, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict[edit]

Hi - sorry, I had made a lot of revisions to the format. Could you please go and re-do your edit? I didn't mean to erase yours, I just didn't know how to save so many changes. peace Billyshiverstick (talk) 02:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That statement is not, "clearly cited in the body".[edit]

@Smuckola "It has been called a portrayal of the struggle in America between capital and labor." is not, "clearly cited in the body". If it is, then clearly cite behind the statement. MEHAFAHS (talk) 05:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MEHAFAHS: What on earth are you talking about? It's the last sentence in the article (WP:LEADCITE). Stop abusing the term "disruptive editing" or you'll get yourself a warning. I didn't write any of these ideas whatsoever, just minor copy editing. It's just that I can read! So read it, and revert your edit. — Smuckola (talk) 06:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no, a warning? How will I continue to live peacefully? MEHAFAHS (talk) 06:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]