Talk:Forest Hills, Boston

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Boston (assessed as High-importance).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

In an attempt to take this article to GA I am going to make a few proposals regarding layout. Content is great with lots of inline references. Could use another couple of images - I will take a look around at PBL and see if I can find some good historical ones.

Remove Topic headline – this feels like a catchall and create the following
History

Woodbourne is not a National Historic Landmark! Corrected the text to reflect its status as a National Register Historic District.

Places of interest

Subcats

Education - include comments about overall education system

Schools

Transportation
Keep Notes - References - and Bibliography.
Markco1 17:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Making changes[edit]

First, I have to question whether the entire area described is withing Forest Hills. I always considered the area south of Walk Hill Street to be White City (as mentioned in the article). The article suggests that Forest Hills is part of Jamaica Plain, and White City (or Woodbourne) is part of Forest Hills. Did the residents of the south end of White City consider themselves residents of Forest Hills? Not that I remember. That's just one more subdivision than I'd make. I'd call Forest Hills and White City/Woodbourne separate sections of Jamaica Plain which would take away much of this article.

Overview setion:

No need of a listing of particular businesses.

Clarified location of types of houses.

Removed "and so forth".

Forest Hills was not "unmistakably middle-class". The area near the station was built up for working class Irish when the train station went in, and settled by other working people in later years. My Grandmother certainly wasn't middle class when she lived there. The Woodbourne area WAS middle-class, which brings up my original question - should Woodbourne be considered part of Forest Hlls?

Forest Hills is not in close proximity to Northeastern (like the Fens or the South End) - it is more correctly accessible by public transportation.

No sense in listing specific parts of downtown as accessible, but not others.

Borders section: There's the problem - if the border is Walk Hill, then the article makes no sense.

"More often, Forest Hills refers to a roughly triangular area lying between Hyde Park Avenue, American Legion Highway and Morton Street,"

Big problem there: not a triangle. I assume that Cummins Hwy. is meant to be the "point" of the triangle in the south. The border is definitely north of Cummins Hwy., and needs to be defined better than leaving it implied.

"White City and Woodbourne are discussed in this article under their own headings."

No need to say this if the reader will see it seconds later.

Forest Hills Station section:

Heath Street is not in Mission Hill - Mission Hill is on the other side of Parker Hill.

I'm getting sleepy now - that's enough for me.

More changes. I removed the following:"An anonymous Jamaica Plain Library chronicler in the 1930's describes Jamaica Plain of that time as follows:

Quite a number of colored families now reside in the less attractive area in the vicinity of the railroad tracks. There are now very few descendants of the original settlers in Jamaica Plain. The more prolific Irish Catholic families have replaced them in numbers as well as influence. The present population of approximately 19,000 is predominantly Catholic of Irish descent.^[1]

"

The passage describes all of Jamaica Plain, and is not specific to White City. There is also something hinky with the date of the passage. The full reference cites the memory of the writer to his childhood in the 1940s, so the 1930 reference must be a typo. The reference to Cubans in the original is a dead giveaway. MarkinBoston 20:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Guide to Jamaica Plain

While I'm at it....[edit]

The one to three sentence paragraphs in this article are painful to read. The whole article really needs to be rewritten in coherent paragraphs. MarkinBoston 20:17, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paring down[edit]

I removed a reference to "one Filipino family" in the White City section, and a reference link that did not support the claim made.MarkinBoston 18:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also removed the reference to black and Hispanic residents in the Archdale projects. When those projects were built, most if not all of the first residents were white, so the assertion made was more in the imagination of the writer than in fact. The statement seems POV to me, and is not relevant to an article on Forest Hills. MarkinBoston 22:28, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Hyde Park Ave and Wachusett St entries. Noting that "a street goes here, then there" doesn't deserve an entry. MarkinBoston 16:08, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Forest Hills, Boston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:07, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Forest Hills, Boston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100612222341/http://bostonpublicschools.org/node/3526 to http://www.bostonpublicschools.org/node/3526

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:07, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Forest Hills, Boston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061006081231/http://www.dedhamhistorical.org/history.php to http://www.dedhamhistorical.org/history.php
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.harvardmag.com/nd98/welds.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Guide to Jamaica Plain

[1]