Talk:Francis Hopkinson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Federal judge[edit]

This article says nothing about his service as a federal judge, beyond the mere fact shown in the infobox. More is needed to provide information for a class or importance rating.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Francis Hopkinson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:08, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested sources about the flag question[edit]

flagguys.com "The Francis Hopkinson Flag" ( hop.html )

The website above, even if commercial, show a lot of info about the Hopkinson flag (book author, 1992 commemorative pictorial postmark, etc.); can be interesting look it.

--151.68.181.135 (talk) 16:48, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Flag Controversy section needs updated. The final paragraph dwells on Betsy Ross (a manufacturer) and detracts from the subject of this article (a designer, congressional representative, and public official). This material is covered elsewhere for Wikipedia readers that want that information. Also, the statement "many Americans today still cling to the Betsy Ross legend," while perhaps true, is not cited nor is it as neutral as we try to be on Wikipedia. Also also, "The circle of stars (a circle connotes eternity) first appeared after the war ended and after Hopkinson's original design" is cited, but is wrong. Circle patterns in the canton are described as early as 1777, according to sources on the Betsy Ross flag article.

I agree. This section might have contradictions in it, but at the very least it's confusing and should be re-written for clarification.
  • The section states "Hopkinson is recognized as the designer of the Flag…" and the opening paragraph of the article outright states that Hopkinson "designed the first official American flag." Yet the same section says that Hopkinson's request was "comical" and that Congress denied the claim, in part because he was not the only contributor to the design. This indicates that Hopkinson is a designer, not the designer.
  • The 3rd paragraph begins "There is no known sketch of a Hopkinson flag." The end of the paragraph states "Hopkinson's U.S. flag might also have intended the use of 6-pointed stars. This is bolstered by his original sketch…" This last sentence might be referring to the seal rather than the flag, but it's confusing- especially since this is all lumped in under a section titled "Flag Controversy."
  • Agreed, the Betsy Ross paragraph is both off-topic and misleading. If relevant, it could be reduced to a single sentence, that more people know Betsy Ross' name that Hopkinson. The Cooper reference is misunderstood; I believe Cooper refers to a specific flag, not the circle design itself. I can verify this, but either way, there are earlier references to a circle of stars, so this should be removed.
  • The "Hopkinson's letter and response" sub-section is redundant. Almost all of this information is covered in preceding or subsequent paragraphs. It should be consolidated and deleted.
  • The "Great Seal of the United States" sub-section is mostly repeated information, because the "flag" claims are mostly based on his work with the seal. Canute (talk) 22:00, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I made these changes, today.
  • Consolidated different paragraphs and sections on flag design and split Great Seal paragraphs into their own section
  • Changed "the" designer to "a designer"
  • Requested citation for "no known sketch" and referenced contradiction in same paragraph
  • Reduced "Betsy Ross" to one mention and one sentence
It still needs a lot of cleanup, but I hope this is a significant improvement. Canute (talk) 18:32, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]