Talk:Frank Vigar

Citation style

In addition to the stats tag I have also added the citation style one. This is because the numerous CricketArchive references quote the date of the match instead of making a useful statement of what the reference is about, such as "match scorecard". Using the date of the match in this way is completely misleading. ----Jack | ^{talk page} 19:57, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

I would have said that Team v team makes it fairly obvious that it is a scorecard, but will see how consensus goes. I think most of the cricket articles do this. SGGH ^ping! 22:13, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

No, most cricket articles use "CricketArchive – match scorecard. Retrieved on ddmmyy." or similar. And it is not obvious that it is a scorecard to people who are unfamiliar with cricket. ----Jack | ^{talk page} 03:51, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frank Vigar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110408184025/http://www.cultureandrecreation.gov.au/articles/sportinggreats/ to http://www.cultureandrecreation.gov.au/articles/sportinggreats/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)