Talk:Fraud Act 2006

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fraud Act 2006 Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland. I did think that I was being of assistance I will refrain in future.

Apologies, but we can't accept Crown Copyright material - the limitations on reuse mean we would need to exert control over how it's used in future, which we have no capacity to do. Sorry for the inconvenience. Shimgray | talk | 17:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Is it ok to post a link under 'external links' to the article Fraud Act 2006

I would suggest that, provided the condition of the copyright waiver is shown clearly on the page (i.e. quotes from the Act must only be from original Government sites, not from other quotes), Wikipedia would be covered. It is virtually impossible to discuss the exact effect of legislation without quoting some part of it.--Esthameian 01:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I find it difficult to understand why my contribution was deleted because the material was Crown Copyright. If Wikipedia aspires to provide accurate information to the general public there must, in my opinion, be room for Crown Copyright material to be posted.

The material featured on this site is subject to Crown copyright protection unless otherwise indicated. The Crown copyright protected material (other than the Royal Arms and departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. Where any of the Crown copyright items on this site are being republished or copied to others, the source of the material must be identified and the copyright status acknowledged.

The permission to reproduce Crown protected material does not extend to any material on this site which is identified as being the copyright of a third party. Authorisation to reproduce such material must be obtained from the copyright holders concerned.

OPSI encourages users to establish hypertext links to this site." See OPSI website

Ron Barker (talk) 11:10, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Section for Civil Action for Fraud in Tort? Shouldn't this also reference an action for fraud in tort in English law? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.183.208.164 (talk) 15:34, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fraud Act 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]