Talk:Frederic Clay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frederic Clay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of works; manuscripts/publisher[edit]

An editor added a list of the composer's works. It looked good, but as it is completely uncited I have deleted it for now. If we can get citations it will be a valuable addition. Not so sure about another addition - the location of manuscripts: perhaps not of encyclopaedic interest? Tim riley talk 18:56, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the location of the manuscripts and name of publisher are not of encyclopedic interest. I agree that the list of works can be included if adequately referenced per WP:V. -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:41, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If the editor who added the list can supply a source, well and good. If not, I'll have a go myself. Tim riley talk 11:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These additions should have been allowed to stand. It is quite sad to see legitimate entries reverted. I don't think the entries were correctly styled, but far better to improve them than delete them. It seems a few regular editors here have lost their way. Marc Shepherd (talk) 14:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Please feel free to add the necessary citations to meet Wikipedia's requirements. I look forward to seeing the restored material when you have finished. As noted above, I had it on my to-do list, but I can now remove it. Tim riley talk 18:00, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]