Talk:Frederick Browning/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:34, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

In the references section

1. Mead, Richard (2007) is listed in the bibliography but does not appear to have been used

   YRemoved Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:17, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

2. Some of the books have the place it was published included other do not: Buckingham, Harclerode, Neillands, Otway, Pugsley and Thompson do not

   YAll corrected. Also added OCLCs. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:17, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Disamb links that need attention.

1. Arthur Harris, Battle of Cambrai, Eton

   YAll corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:17, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

On hold

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:34, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Passed GA Jim Sweeney (talk) 12:51, 12 May 2011 (UTC)