Talk:Frederick Curzon, 7th Earl Howe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Section on tobacco lobbying removed[edit]

I removed the section on tobacco lobbying because I'm unconvinced that it is relevant for an encyclopedic biography of Lord Howe. To be more specific:

1. The section was based on two articles, by the same journalist, in the same newspaper, on the same day. I have done a pretty thorough search of the news archives at google, I see no other reputable papers mentioning the incident.

2. Although the newspaper articles couched this event in the language of controversy, it seems entirely unclear what is supposed to be controversial about it. Leaked emails show that when pondering new regulation on cigarette sales in the UK, Lord Howe was in email contact with anti-tobacco campaigners and tobacco company representatives. There is no suggestion, not even a hint, that he did anything illegal or improper, unless one thinks that to even talk to someone you're about to regulate is wrong. If further details emerge that he accepted or asked for payment, or something awful like that, then of course this is likely to become a bigger story and part of his biography. But that a health minister asks for comment on proposed legislation from companies being regulated, and listens to those comments, strikes me as good governance and quite boring and routine. I could be persuaded by additional reliable sources saying that this is somehow a big deal.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 13:58, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Its a big deal because it breaches the World Health Organisation's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which says governments must be transparent in their dealings with organisations that have links to the tobacco industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.74.111.71 (talk) 19:08, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Does he have ANY qualifications to run a Health Service at all?[edit]

Or indeed, any background in patient safety? Seems a ridiculous appointment. And many of the regulations his dimwits have removed as part of the 'Red Tape Challenge' were actually put in place as the government's 'protective obligations' under Art.2 HRA - absurd and arguably illegal. 79.74.98.80 (talk) 17:37, 5 October 2014 (UTC)pleb79.74.98.80 (talk) 17:37, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

EU Farm subsidies?[edit]

Any idea how much he receives annually?79.74.111.71 (talk) 19:04, 5 October 2014 (UTC)twl79.74.111.71 (talk) 19:04, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Frederick Curzon, 7th Earl Howe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Frederick_Curzon,_7th_Earl_Howe&oldid=1207654368"