Talk:Frederick William Stellhorn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why this article is ready[edit]

1. It was never threatened with deletion in the first place

2. sources properly formatted

3. Sources two and four are independent. The rest of the sources came from the denomination "Ohio Synod" that he was an important leader in, or from a merged denomination that included the Ohio Synod. Source one does not establish notability, but source four is from a Christian-topical encyclopedia--a tertiary source, and it is from a different denomination than the one that holds him as a leader today. That is enough to establish notability. It is my understanding that general non-Lutheran protestant references from his lifetime to his theology/or to him do exist. I went and added one of them, so that would be source 9. It is an original book review by a third party reviewer of one of the Stellhorn's more significant books.

I am not a member of, or have I ever been, a member of a denomination that promotes Stellhorn or his theology. Nor am I paid by any Lutheran denomination.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 21:48, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]