Talk:Frederick de la Roche

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Frederick wasn't chancellor of the kingdom of 1150[edit]

As I have explained in this page : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Officers_of_the_Kingdom_of_Jerusalem#Possible_errors_in_chancellors there was probably no chancellor at this moment, and even there would be one, Frederick would not have forgotten to include his title as bishop of Acre net to his title as chancellor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:41D0:FE75:FB00:290:F5FF:FE8B:4EBF (talk) 08:56, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]