This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Longevity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the World's oldest people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LongevityWikipedia:WikiProject LongevityTemplate:WikiProject LongevityLongevity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
I looked at the recent previous AfD when reviewing this, and from what I saw the article appeared to have been poorly sourced. This article is in stark contrast to that, with a high number of sources that clearly meet the WP:GNG. Despite the possible "sketchiness" of the age claim, the subject clearly (in my opinion) meets the GNG. AviationFreak💬 21:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Elizium23, Could you specify what part of process I ignored? I reached out to Tone, the closing admin, who said I could recreate by going through AFC, which is exactly what I did. Nomming for G4 here (when it isn't similar to the article, I should know) seems to be more out-of-process to me. Of course you can take it back to afd, however. Best, Eddie891TalkWork 21:05, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
G4 doesn't apply because this article is not substantially similar, and itaddresses issues of the AFD discussion where the sourcing itself was not discussed. See discussion on User_talk:Tone#Fredie_Blom, where I followed the correct procedure for recreating articles after AFD. You can take it back to afd if you like, but G4 absolutely doesn't apply. Best, --Eddie891TalkWork 21:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am happy that the article has been rewritten in an encyclopediac manner with neutral point of view. I should thank Eddie891 for their voluntary support with this subject as I mentioned my thoughts about the Afd consensus in Wikipedia:Discord few days ago. See the relevant discussion User_talk:Tone#Fredie_Blom where Eddie followed the correct procedure by asking the consent from Tone. It was me who indirectly influenced Eddie to create this article again and they have done fine job with the article. To be honest, Eddie clearly had no intention whatsoever to recreate the article. Anyway I honestly agree that the article which I had initially created on 23 August 2020 lacked the encyclopediac value where I added unnecessary details about his smoking and his stance against the government. Since there is a wide coverage about this subject, the subject clearly meets WP:GNG. Abishe (talk) 02:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
