Talk:Freeman family murders

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyvio

I have blanked this page for copyvio from the following sources:

Copyright

Currently majorly editing the article so the copyright is fixed. Inexpiable (talk) 12:17, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are still doing too much close paraphrasing from the Morning Call source. For example:

Source: stuffed a pair of shorts in her mouth and stabbed her repeatedly.

Article: Bryan stuffed a pair of shorts into her mouth and stabbed her repeatedly to death with a steak knife.

Source: where they beat Dennis Freeman with an aluminum baseball bat and metal exercise bar as he lay asleep in bed.

Article: where they beat 54-year-old Dennis Freeman to death with an aluminum baseball bat and metal exercise bar while he lay asleep in bed.

Source: Birdwell also attacked 11-year-old Erik Freeman, who was also asleep, hitting him repeatedly with a 3-foot pick ax handle.

Article: Birdwell then attacked 11-year-old Erik Freeman, who was also asleep, hitting him repeatedly with a 3-foot pick ax handle until he died.

Source: when the car he was driving ran out of gas in Missouri

Article: He was caught after the car he was driving ran out of gas in Missouri.

Source: He was involuntarily committed and remains under state supervision at Wernersville State Hospital in Berks County.

Article: He was involuntarily committed and currently remains under state supervision at Wernersville State Hospital, in Berks County, Pennsylvania.

Source: Bryan Freeman had been hospitalized twice for mental illness and his brother David was treated for substance abuse and had been held in several juvenile facilities

Article: Bryan was hospitalized twice for mental illness and David received treatment for substance abuse and had been in several juvenile facilities.

Surely these descriptions can be rewritten in your own words? I trimmed down one case of close paraphrasing in the article. Yoninah (talk) 20:06, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this, Yoninah – it would have saved me a good deal of time if I had seen it before investigating the article history, but for some reason it had been deleted. As I'm sure you know, our practice is in general to remove copyright violations completely, rather than copy-editing them to make them less similar to the source. In this case there were violations right from the first revision, so there was no clean version to revert to. The article can now be rewritten by anyone who has the interest to do so. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:14, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and this was posted BEFORE I reverted and changed it all. I have rewritten the entire thing since this was posted!!! I already address ALL THOSE ISSUES Yonniah mentioned! Now once again this important article getting 100+ views a day can now no longer be viewed. But hey if it means you get to delete peoples hard work that's what makes you happy I guess. Inexpiable (talk) 14:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.wfmz.com/news/lehigh-valley/conversation-with-convicted-killer-bryan-freeman_20160530063901772/21041927, http://www.mcall.com/news/local/mc-freeman-howorth-murders-anniversary-20150227-story.html, http://articles.mcall.com/2005-02-27/news/3587623_1_dennis-freeman-nelson-birdwell-iii-brothers, http://articles.mcall.com/1996-04-27/news/3094231_1_dennis-freeman-family-victims, http://www.nytimes.com/1995/03/03/us/2-skinhead-brothers-charged-with-killing-family-members.html and the like. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:04, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed issue

Moved from my talk-page

– Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:57, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The issue of copyright has been resolved already I fixed the issues for Freeman family murders Inexpiable (talk) 14:18, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert the Freeman family murders page I spent hours changing it already. Initially it was at 65% copyvio and I cut it down to under 30% and now you've deleted all my hard work. I'm going to quit wiki if its not reverted this is ridiculous check my last edit with Earwig Copyvio. https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Freeman+family+murders&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=0&use_links=1&turnitin=0 Inexpiable (talk) 14:22, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you actually bothered to read this talk page [[1]] before deleting peoples work you'd know I already spoke to an admin and fixed all this already. You really want to just delete a well known case like this from Wikipedia? Which is getting 100+ views a day [[2]] Inexpiable (talk) 14:33, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inexpiable, the copyright problem had not by any means been resolved. You had removed the copyvio template (which you are not allowed to do – it carries in large letters the message "Do not restore or edit the blanked content on this page until the issue is resolved by an administrator, copyright clerk or OTRS agent", which you completely ignored) and changed the wording of some sentences. The original copyright violations had not been removed, but copy-edited; parts remained. An example:

Our article, revision 771428237	The source
Bryan pleaded guilty to Brenda's murder to avoid the death penalty. His brother David pleaded guilty to the murder of Dennis. Birdwell went to trial for all three murders. […] No one has been convicted for Erik's murder.	Freeman said he pleaded guilty to his mother's death to avoid the death penalty. His brother, David, pleaded guilty to the death of his father; Birdwell went to trial for all three murders […] No one has been convicted for Eric's death.

That is copyright violation, and we don't allow it here.

I've now read the talk-page discussion you linked to – I'd have done so before if I'd known about it. I don't see anything there about talking to an admin. I do see that Yoninah told you very clearly (and, I believe, quite rightly) "No, they're copyvios" when you tried to suggest that the remaining copying in the article was acceptable. Anyway, I'm completely open to review of the action I've taken here. Why don't you ask the admin you spoke to (or indeed any admin) to take a look and comment if necessary? Or, if you prefer, I could ask one of those active in copyright clean-up to drop by. Your call … Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]