Talk:French cruiser Châteaurenault (1898)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 03:21, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Criteria

1. Prose  On hold

2. Verifiability  On hold

3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass

4. Neutral ✓ Pass

5. Stable ✓ Pass

6. Illustrations ✓ Pass

7. Miscellaneous  On hold

Comments

1.

• Length is given as 140 m in the infobox, and as 135 m in the prose
  • Fixed
• Beam is given as 17 m in the prose and as 18 m in the infobox
  • Fixed
• Draft is given as 7.39 m in the prose and 7.5 in the infobox
  • Fixed
• Displacement is 7898 in the prose and 8200 in the infobox
  • Fixed
• Complement is 604 in the prose and 625 in the infobox
  • Fixed
• Isn't it standard to have the range in the infobox?
  • Yup, good catch
• " cast iron, AP, and SAP projectiles" - I can tell what AP and SAP stand for, but the acronyms should be introduced instead of just brought it
  • Huh, I could've sworn I did that when I wrote that section - must have gotten distracted
• Isn't armor plating typically in the infobox for these ships, too?
  • Yes indeed - added
• Prose says keel laying in May 1896, infobox says 12 October 1895*
  • Fixed

2.

• The exact commissioning date of 10 October 1902 is not cited, only the month and year are.
  • Fixed
• Namesake is not cited
  • Removed
• Shouldn't Garbett go before Gardiner in the ordering of the references?
  • Yep
• The succeeded by class needs cited
  • I don't think there's an expectation that nav templates need sources

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

• The short description of "ship" is a bit lacking, something like "French protected cruiser" would be better.
  • Added that

The infobox needs quite a bit of work. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:20, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, I forgot to overhaul the box when I finished writing the article. Parsecboy (talk) 00:57, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Passing. Hog Farm _Bacon 02:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)