Talk:French destroyer Le Terrible/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 07:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 07:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Looks like you touched your own trap again. I can see a British "Draught" again in the article's infobox. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 08:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • I made that mistake with every ship in the class, but they're all fixed now.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:49, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • They returned to Metropolitan France before the end I'm not sure or Metropolitan France is a proper noun?

It's a proper name.

  • in late April 1940 in case Italy decided to enter the war Pipe Italy to the Kingdom of Italy.
    • I think that Fascist Italy (1922–1943) would be a better link.
  • Le Terrible was sent to the Mediterranean at the beginning Link Mediterranean.
    • Amusingly, we're on opposite sides of our usual geography link discussions as I think that it is well-enough known not to need a link.
  • rest of the year searching for Axis shipping with two of her sisters Link Axis.
  • The ships displaced 2,569 metric tons (2,528 long tons) at standard Link both tonnes.
  • completed on 1 October 1935 and entered service on 5 February 1936 No 1935 required here.
  • Are there links for the not-yet-linked units?
    • You'll have to be more specific than that as I'm not seeing anything other than tonnes not linked.
  • I don't think that sources in English are good enough to build decent articles on them.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:10, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The ships were refitted and then transferred to Alexandria, Egypt Pipe Egypt to the Kingdom of Egypt.
  • French West Africa is overlinked.
  • eight 20-millimeter (0.8 in) Oerlikon guns were also added You mean cannons?
  • French Algeria is over linked.
  • on 17 October to rendezvous with the battleship Richelieu at the Azores and escorted Add Portugal after the Azores.
  • Link Corsica.
  • Ordered on 20 June 1931 as part of the 1930 Naval Program --> "Ordered and laid down on 20 June 1931 as part of the 1930 Naval Program"? Because the infobox says it was also laid down at the same time.
    • My mistake, the infobox was wrong.
  • on 28 August where she was decommissioned on 1 September and was used Maybe add a year after 1 September because the infobox says "1 September 1953".
    • Typo.

Images

  • In the image File:Le_contretorpilleur_le_Terrible.jpg I can see a British post-war.
    • Replaced

Source

  • Rohwer's book has a little typo in its title. It should be "Chronology of the War at Sea 1939–1945: The Naval History of World War II" instead of "Chronology of the War at Sea 1939–1945: The Naval History of World War Two".
    • My copy uses "Two"
  • WP:GBOOKS says we should link via an URL link in the books "French Battleships 1922–1956", "French Cruisers, 1922−1956" and "French Destroyers: Torpilleurs d'Escadre & Contre-Torpilleurs 1922–1956".
    • There's a bot running around and adding GBook links. I'll let it take care of that.

Infobox

  • "Reclassified: As a light cruiser, 28 September 1943" I think you forgot to add this information in the body? It also hasn't a citation which is a little bit OR.
    • I did forget.
  • "74,000 PS (54,000 kW; 73,000 shp)" The same as above.
  • Propulsion part is also forgotten in the body.
    • Both of these are in the 1st para of the Design and description section
  • Maybe also add the number of crewmen at peacetime into the infobox?
    • Nah, they can read the article if they want to find out.

That's anything, a great article, good job. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 21:20, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. It reminded me that I need to be more careful with these before I nominate them and will provide me with a useful checklist of things to look for before I do.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:03, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Great, I think we can pass this one right now. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 13:26, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]