Talk:Frequency (marketing)

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 31 January 2024 by reviewer Relativity (talk · contribs).

Marketing & Advertising High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Comparing with "Effective frequency" and possible merge?[edit]

I stumbled upon this page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_frequency) after creating this page.

Upon reading it, the other page seems to be a subset of the more general concept of "frequency" that this page is based on. Specifically, the other page talks of the most effective, or optimal, frequency amount that a business should have to have the best return on investment.

So I think in considering the creation of this page, it might make sense to merge the other page on effective frequency into this newer and general page.

Thoughts?

Erictleung (talk) 20:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Made the merge here Erictleung (talk) 19:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Title change?[edit]

In looking at a very related page, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reach_(advertising), the disambiguation in parentheses is "advertising". Meanwhile, this article on frequency, I decided to use "marketing". To be consistent with the closely related subject of reach, I wouldn't mind changing this article's title to be "Frequency (advertising)" instead. As a newer editor, I wasn't sure how to. But thought I might as well put it out there what other more senior editors think about it.

Erictleung (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Potential references and resources[edit]

Taken from merged from Effective frequency page.

The following is a list of articles and books on the subject of various theories and models of advertising.

Books[edit]

Colin McDonald. What is the Short-term Effect of Advertising?. Marketing Science Institute – 1971 (Book)
Michael J. Naples. Effective Frequency. (Paperback)
A Sawyer and S Ward. Carry-over Effects in Advertising Communication: Evidence and Hypotheses from Behavioral Science. Marketing Science Institute. 1976 (Book)

Articles[edit]

Batra, Rajeev, Donald R. Lehmann, Joanne Burke, and Jae Pae. "When Advertising Have An Impact? A Study of Tracking Data." Journal of Advertising Research 35, 5 (1995): 19–32
Chessa, Antonio, and Jaap Murre. "A new memory model for ad impact and scheduling. Think of media impacts as incidents of learning. Then apply the maths of learning theory, and, hey presto! Guidelines for scheduling appear." Admap, 36(3; ISSU 145), 37–40.[1]
Craig, C. Samuel, Brian Sternthal, and Clark Leavite. "Advertising Wearout: An Experimental Analysis." Journal of Marketing Research 13, 4 (1976): 356–372
Lawrence D. Gibson. "What Can One TV Exposure Do?" Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 36, 1996
Stephen J. Hoch, and John Deighton. "Managing What Consumers Learn from Experience." Journal of Marketing, Vol. 53, No. 2 (Apr., 1989), pp. 1–20
John Philip Jones. "Ad Spending: Maintaining Market Share." Harvard Business Review 68, 1 (1990): 38–41
John Philip Jones. "Single-Source Research Begins to Fulfill Its Promise." Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 35, 1995
Herbert E. Krugman. "The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning Without Involvement" Public Opinion Quarterly, volume 29, page 349, 1965.
Herbert E. Krugman. "Why Three Exposures May Be Enough." Journal of Advertising Research 12, 6 (1972): 11–14
Leonard M Lodish, Magid Abraham, Stuart Kalmenson, Jeanne Livelsberger, Beth Lubftkin, Bruce Richardson, and Mary Ellen Stevens. "How TV Advertising Works: A Meta-Analysis of 389 Real World Split Cable TV Advertising Experiments." Journal of Marketing Research 32, 2 (1995): 125–139
Deborah MacInnis, Ambar Rao, Bernard Jaworski. "Advertising Context, Consumer Response and Brand Sales: Findings from Split-Cable Television Experiments." Working Paper. University of Southern California, 1997
Cornelia Pechmann and David W. Stewart. "Loyalty and Brand Purchase: A Two Stage Model of Choice." Journal of Marketing Research 25, 2 (1988)
Cornelia Pechmann and David W. Stewart. "Advertising Repetition: A Critical Review of Wearin and Wearout." Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 11, 2 (1992): 285–330
Gerard J. Tellis. "Advertising Exposure, Loyalty and Brand Purchase: A Two Stage Model of Choice." Journal of Marketing Research 25, 2 (1988) 138–144
Hubert A. Zielske. "The Remembering and Forgetting of Advertising." Journal of Marketing, Vol. 23, No. 3 pp. 239–243 (Jan., 1959)