Talk:Frog (fastening)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
By all means merge Frog (fastening) with Chinese frog, or alternatively merge Chinese frog with Frog (fastening). The term Chinese frog is new to me. --Len 19:20, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
I agree. Frog fastening was the term I looked up, even though I knew that they were originally chinese.
It is about textile. There is no reason to merge since it is related to textile term.
Can we have an illustration of just the fastener? From the description I have no idea how they differ mechanically from buttons.[edit]
The current images are useless. swestrup (talk) 05:31, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Undiscussed move[edit]
re [1] and the move to Pankou (fastening).
PCC556, you can't move an article from a European name and content slant to a purely Chinese one on the grounds that there's no European content in there when you've just deleted all of that content.
If you want to move this article to Pankou (fastening) (as you did), then I'd probably support such a move. Most of the content here is Chinese. But we'd have to leave a workable article behind at Frog (fastening), not simply delete all of that, as you've just done. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)