Talk:Fully Buffered DIMM

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

240-Pins[edit]

It should be noted somewhere that the 240-pin configuration is NOT compatible with DDR2 memory either logically or physically. FB-DIMM's are notched differently (probably a good thing since they are not electrically compatible) See: Crucial Explanationfor reference. BluesFiddler 05:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there such a thing as an ECC or non-ECC fully buffered dimm? Or does the architecture obviate the need -- I can't find anything in the article about whether the CRC means there's no such thing as ECC or non-ECC fully-buffered dimm. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.194.187.135 (talk) 02:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Added very late, but...) All FB-DIMMs are ECC. That's why data transfers are in units of 72 and 144 bits. If you look, there are 10 memory chips on the back and 8 on the front. The AMB takes up 2 chips worth of space. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 23:42, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inquirer?[edit]

Okay, reference number 11, The Inquirer, is definitely not a reliable source.

68.244.247.239 (talk) 21:36, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Compare with registered[edit]

I'm not sure what the difference between "Registered" and "Fully Buffered" is, and this article doesn't seem to make it clear. Pippin (talk) 18:58, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

outdated information[edit]

"Intel has adopted the technology for their newer Xeon 5000/5100 series and beyond, which they consider "a long-term strategic direction for servers".[6]" Afaict all the new nahelm based xeons use plain ddr3! dpes anyone know exactly which xeons used FBDIMMs (was it all the core2 based ones?) so we can fix this statement up? Plugwash (talk) 11:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Compatability.[edit]

The most important message of this article should be the fact that FB-DIMM DDR2 not compatable with DIMM DDR2. All IT specialists that I asked do not knew this fact. I payed money to find that FB-DIMM memory is useless for my DDR2 computer. DmitryP0 (talk) 00:34, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Correction. indents.[edit]

"FB-DIMMS have 240 pins and are the same total length as other DDR DIMMs but differ by having indents on both ends within the slot." I am new on wikipedia, and not fill comfortable to correct this, but I found no difference in "indents on both ends within the slot.". I have a photo, and going to upload it. DmitryP0 (talk) 00:54, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fully Buffered DIMM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Fully Buffered DIMM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:28, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fully_Buffered_DIMM&oldid=1202170473"