Talk:Function prologue and epilogue

This instruction is not used by GCC because it sets up the stack frame slightly differently - it swaps the last two instructions of the prologue.

The following paragraphs show the methods to be functionally equivalent, so this doesn't really answer why GCC does what it does (I've edited the sentence accordingly). This leaves the question: why then does it do what it does? Shinobu 16:05, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 August 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Unopposed move request (WP:RMNOMIN). (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 01:53, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Function prologue → Function prologue and epilogue – Equal space is given in the article to function prologues and function epilogues. Rublov (talk) 10:44, 18 August 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 18:53, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.