Talk:Furileusauria

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Furileusauria-->Carnotaurini[edit]

What are anyone's thoughts on moving this page, Furileusauria, into Carnotaurini? Clearly, they're synonymous, with Furileusauria being the morphological definition and Carnotaurini being the cladistic defintion, and Carnotaurini would be the senior synonym (Coria et al. 2002 [1]) --Hiroizmeh (talk) 19:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, nevermind; Furileusauria would be the parent taxon as it is defined as most inclusive clade containing Carnotaurus but notIlokelesia, Skorpiovenator, or Majungasaurus, and Carnotaurini is defined as the most inclusive clade containing Carnotaurus and Aucasaurus, common ancestor, and all its descendants. --Hiroizmeh (talk) 19:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should Carnotaurinae, Furileusauria, and Carnotaurini be merged or have their own pages?

I believe Furileusauria and Carnotaurini should be merged, with Furileusauria being the page name, since it's a more inclusive clade by definition. Carnotaurinae should be discarded because it's not used anymore since Abelisaurus is believed to be a derived abelisaurid. Meekororum (talk) 23:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal notice[edit]

This article is involved in a larger merge proposal discussion taking place at WT:DINO. LittleLazyLass (Talk | Contributions) 21:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]