A fact from Gārgī Vāchaknavī appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 March 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 04:02, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have added full debate and some new sources. If there is any mistake, let me know --Haccom ✉ Talk to me 11:21, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Haccom: You have added the entire verbatim text of the dialogue under quotes. It is fine. But I am not sure how the reviewer will take it. Let us see. Of the two external links, the first one does not open. The second one may not be acceptable. Any way thanks for the edits.--Nvvchar. 06:47, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Nvvchar: I fixed the external links. Gargi is mainly known for her debate and it should be plausible to include the full debate. --Haccom ✉ Talk to me 09:46, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Nvvchar: This will probably pass, and the problems that I'm seeing appear to be caused by other editors, rather than you. Let's get started!
Why isn't she in the "Hindu philosophy" navbox?
I have now added a template on Indian Philosophy which includes names of philosophers where the name of Gargi Vachaknavi is added
Do we have any idea about her birth and death dates?
I have done extensive library search but could not find any direct details of her birth year but she was a contemporary of Yagnavalkys who lived in the 7th century BC. Brihadrayaka Upanishad is also dated to around 700 BC and her intellectual debate finds mention there. I have given this date in the default box and also at the start.
I would add a little bit more in the lead from the early and later life sections.
Done
Repetition of "sage" in the first sentence of early life.
Cirrected
"Right from a young age she was very keen on learning as she had an intellectual bent of mind." This is very clumsily worded--perhaps "from a young age, Vachaknavi was very intellectual."
Cchnaged as suggested
"often surpassed men" would probably be better than "even surpassed men"
Done
"She awakened her kudalini" how do we know this? Also, seems to be unsourced.
Ref fixed
"rich contributions" not "rich contributions"
Done
That paragraph in the "debate" section is way too long.
Yes, I have pruned the entire section conforming to the text when article a was approved for DYK on 25 March 2015 here [[1]]
This could be due to other editors, but I would check that paragraph for tone, connection, and weird sentence structures. Because you have an en-5 userbox on your user page, you should be fine to do this yourself. :)
Yes, it has been changed as mentioned above.
Parce through your quotes. In my opinion, both are too long. The first is much too repetitive to be fully quoted, while the second is overly long and should probably be summarized, although part of it can be quoted as well.
This has been done now
"In the above debate…" at the end of that sentence, put "on the nature of Brahman (world of the imperishable)."
Done
"Yagnavalkya felt enough was enough…" That phrase and others throughout the sentence are much too informal, and there is a spelling error ("loose" instead of "lose")
Modified
"Her philosophical views also find mention in the Chandogya Upanishad." Expand on what can be found on her in this work.
There is only a mention of Chandogya Upanishad here but nothing on her contributions
@BenLinus1214: Thanks for a very erudite review. I have addressed all issues in the text as per replies above. Pl let me know if more changes are needed. Nvvchar. 08:33, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
@BenLinus1214: It is really a very fast approval. As I don't get automatic bot message on any of my GAs at the start and approval stages, I would appreciate if you kindly leave a message of approval of this GA on my talk page. Thanks.--Nvvchar. 13:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.jpg){kind=small}
b (citations to reliable sources): 