Talk:G.F. Laundon

	LGBT portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
	This article is supported by the LGBT Person task force.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Fungi Low‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about a mycologist or someone who contributed to the field of mycology

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article should adhere to the gender identity guideline because it contains material about one or more trans women. Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. Some people go by singular they pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included if the person was notable while using the name; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.

If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the LGBT WikiProject, or, in the case of living people, to the BLP noticeboard.

Name[edit]

Due to the several names that Gillian was known by I think that the title of G.F. Laundon is the best to represent these all in a neutral way. This is also the most common form she was known in the scientific literature. --Onco p53 (talk) 21:59, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Two obituaries have the name Geoffry rather than Geoffrey but the latter is on the birth certificate. --Onco p53 (talk) 21:59, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh, this is a problem. The birth certificate is unfortunately a primary source, and normally we'll use the form of a name actually used by most people, rather than the "correct" one – blasphemy to a taxonomist, of course. Perhaps mentioning the birth certificate spelling – but is that published in a reliable secondary source? No original research here. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 01:30, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Education[edit]

There are conflicting sources on where she was educated. Some say University of Leicester but I have accepted the obituary written by her brother that states Sheffield University. --Onco p53 (talk) 23:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

I hate sending accomplished academics to AfD because they do not meet the letter of WP:NPROF. It's often quite difficult to figure out whether "substantial impact on the field" is present or not. I feel it's not sufficiently established here. If the gender transition received some more coverage, that would also help. Could editors who have edited this article please chime in with their assessments and/or suggestions for more material? If nothing else is forthcoming, I believe this will need to be grilled at AfD, but it would be nice to avoid that. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:06, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been amended. It turns out that there's a species names after her. That'll do for notability; I shall remove the tag. Schwede 66 23:01, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Erm... Schwede66, hate to disagree, but no. That does not do it. If I name a species X. georgie after my Unca George, that does not make George notable. Taxonomists name species after friends, relatives, teachers etc. all the time, they are free to do it at the drop of a hat and with no oversight, and it means close to nothing. This is not a reason to remove the tag. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:32, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]