Talk:GE Vernova

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Going live[edit]

With the company being officially spun-off in just a few hours, is this draft ready to be moved to mainspace? It looks good enough to me, with no question of it being a notable topic. (I can move it if necessary, as I'm a page mover.) Thanks. BilCat (talk) 20:37, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging User:WiinterU and User:320th Century. BilCat (talk) 20:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I'm not an AFC reviewer, so I won't use that process. That said, anyone can move a draft, and I am an experienced article creator and page mover. There isn't anything major to do to make the article ready for mainspace, as far as I can tell. I was tempted to go ahead and move it without asking first, just in case some over-eager, inexperienced user tries to create an article for it at the main title. I'll wait a few hours for a reply from the main editor, but I'll probably. move it by midnight US Eastern Time if I get no response. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 20:58, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page is not ready, I need more editors to help us. WiinterU (talk) 21:15, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What specifically needs to be done? I think what you have now is good enough to go live with. BilCat (talk) 21:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The history section isn't finished, and the article is too short. WiinterU (talk) 21:30, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has no deadline. As long as the article topic meets WP:GNG, which is does, and the content that it has is suitably referenced to reliable sources, which it appears to be, that is good enough for a start. The rest can be added to the live article as we continue to work on it. Once the company is spun off tomorrow (my time), more people will be looking for the article, and some of those will help to flesh out the article. BilCat (talk) 21:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the external links section. I'm good with navboxes, so I may try to add the main company one tonight or tomorrow. I'm not good with categories or stock templates, so someone else will need to work on those. I'm also not good at writing prose, but I can edit for readability, grammar, etc., though what you have so far looks good. BilCat (talk) 21:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. WiinterU (talk) 21:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. 320th Century (talk) 23:20, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can move it to the mainsace if you'd like. WiinterU (talk) 03:38, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done BilCat (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logo[edit]

All, thank you for your work on this page - much appreciated.

May I ask for one change, please? The GE Vernova logo that you are using was an initial proof, and is the wrong colour. The correct one is at https://www.gevernova.com/themes/custom/ge_vernova_unified/logo.svg. If you need it sized, please let me know.

Thanks, Simon Langford GE Vernova Sehlangford (talk) 18:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. @Sehlangford: Please check the image file to make sure I have all the legal info correct. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 20:43, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - logo looks good.

If you need anything else clarifying, please let me know. Happy to help, but not interfere. Sehlangford (talk) 10:47, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, when this page was created I had limited help. I was getting for editors, however, the best I could get was advice. That was the only logo I could find. When I made this page, I expected a draft article to already exist. It didn't. ^Wiinter_U 23:00, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't take that as a criticism. I was better than no logo at all. BilCat (talk) 02:49, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - wasn't supposed to be criticism at all, apologies if taken as such.

Thank you for making the switch. Sehlangford (talk) 08:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not an issue - thank you for switching the logo. As I mentioned, I work for GE Vernova, so won't make structural changes, but might offer advice on incorrect information for editors to action (or not).

Happy to help with any questions that anyone has.

Thanks Sehlangford (talk) 08:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if it seemed like I took it as criticism. I just had issues with making the page. This is the first page I made. ^Wiinter_U 02:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. You did a great job for your first article. I've been mostly retired from Wikipedia since last October, or I might created it myself had I realized there wasn't draft already being worked on. BilCat (talk) BilCat (talk) 08:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ^Wiinter_U 13:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]