Talk:GJXDM

== In my research I've discovered that this company seems to be on the cutting edge of the use of GJXDM, having one of five projects sharing multiple agency data, using GJXDM publications.

The website is www.crossflo.com == —The preceding unsigned comment was written by 68.235.208.200 (talk • contribs) and later modified by 67.153.173.254 (talk • contribs).

_________________________

(Note that the comment above is from an anonymous source)

_________________________

Why do we keep adding, deleting, and moving information on Bohica Associates COTS NIEM Tools and Crossflo DataExchange? I suggest those who continue to make these changes refer to the article WP:CORP. Personally, I am sure these are fine products, and I have no objection to them being referenced in the GJXDM main article. However, I recommend relegating them solely to the heading, "Supporting tools" under "Commercial software that facilitates exchanging data among multiple disparate data sources using both GJXDM and NIEM", removing them from "See also" and anywhere else in the article. Mike 21:55, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Links to both Bohica and Crossflo have been spammed extensively on Wikipedia, that's why we keep seeing them. I think the list of external links to commercial software in the supporting tools section of this article should be removed before more spammers find it. Wikipedia is not a link repository. —Veyklevar 05:12, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Veyklevar, I think you have removed some useful, relevant content in the changes you made on 2006-05-12. I can appreciate your concern about external links, but I believe at least some of the links you removed are appropriate. Perhaps you are unfamiliar with the GJXDM. When I have a little more time I will work on improving the article, and I may restore some of the content you deleted in the process. —Mike 01:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

I am not committed to any of the changes I have made. Feel free to make what edits you please. There is no need to take an adversarial (or condescending) tone. My problems with the article were that: (1) it was not organised like a typical Wikipedia article, (2) it contained many redundant links (indeed it seemed like a site-map for ojp.gov) (3) the supporting tools section was an invitation for spammers (4) it contained material (like legal disclaimers) copied from the ojp.gov site that just doesn't belong in an encylopedia article.

It still needs more work. The article is still jargon-heavy. It is unlikely that anyone unfamiliar with GJXDM would be helped much by this article. In fact, there's little reason to read this article at all when it has very little but (1) material copied from the ojp.gov website and (2) links to the ojp.gov webstie. Why not just go there in the first place? —Veyklevar 00:27, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, I agree with all your comments except the one about the adversarial (or condescending) tone. Could you please elaborate on your comment, "it was not organized like a typical Wikipedia article"? Mike 03:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

I don't know how you want to put this into the history section, but the truth is the reason why no law enforcement computers can transfer data with each other is that all programmers are a bunch of anti-government anarchists and they don't want the cops to be able to share any information. So they all pretend that they don't know how to do it when it comes up everytime. They act dumb, but they just don't want to do it. (Gomez1918 (talk) 07:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC))

_______________________

Are the authors of this page interested in starting entries on ULEX or JRA or LEXS? These standards aren't covered well.
- Mark Underwood (knowlengr) 20:36, 2 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knowlengr (talk • contribs)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on GJXDM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050405023040/http://it.ojp.gov:80/jxdm/faq.html to http://it.ojp.gov/jxdm/faq.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050405023040/http://it.ojp.gov:80/jxdm/faq.html to http://it.ojp.gov/jxdm/faq.html#
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050405023040/http://it.ojp.gov:80/jxdm/faq.html to http://it.ojp.gov/jxdm/faq.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050401010512/http://it.ojp.gov:80/jxdm/3.0.2/index.html to http://it.ojp.gov/jxdm/3.0.2/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)