Talk:GMV (company)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Closed. No support for the first proposal and a second proposed target was added. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GMV, S.A.GMV — This is the correct name for the company. Rrlc (talk) 13:28, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:29, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


GMV, S.A.GMV Innovating Solutions — 00:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Weight of corruption sanction[edit]

To editor Rrlc: I appreciate your concern about the corruption sanction being given too much importance in the context of the parent company's history. It's not something we can avoid covering, or hide behind a vague header, but we can reduce its relative weight – by expanding on the rest of the company's history. If you can produce neutrally-worded, reliably-sourced content of encyclopedic value on the corporate history outside this event, you are welcome to add it. —swpbT • go beyond • bad idea 13:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]