Talk:Gau Baden

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 25 March 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. No consensus, and the book hits seem to indicate a preference for the current name.  — Amakuru (talk) 21:31, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Gau BadenGau Baden-Elsaß – Renamed, the former name more historical than the more recent one. Chicbyaccident (talk) 13:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are right in principle but please see the discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Germany#Nazi Gaue after which User:Bermicourt moved the articles in question to their English language name. The implication for this article would be that it should be moved to Gau Baden-Alsace, not Gau Baden-Elsaß to comply with WP:TRANSLITERATE. Calistemon (talk) 22:50, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose special characters for Alsace when we have an English spelling for Alsace per Calistemon; also this no longer exists, but spent more time under the current name than the proposed name according to the article. -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 06:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, but I would support a move to Gau Baden-Alsace since the current convention is to use English names for these entities. --Bermicourt (talk) 08:34, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Updated proposal: Gau Baden-Alsace[edit]

Fair enough. Changed proposal: Gau Baden-Alsace. Chicbyaccident (talk) 11:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Two points: First, a Gau with a similar history, Gau Westmark, had four different names and the article title is its final name. Second, this Gau was called Gau Baden twice as long as it was called Gau Baden-Alsace. —  AjaxSmack  02:13, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Cuchullain --CookieMonster755 (talk) 03:30, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.