Talk:George Dixon (boxer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

He's also said to be the greatest bantamweight ever. Trekphiler 01:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC) hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.227.239.190 (talk) 18:20, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Dixon (boxer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:00, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Professional boxing record[edit]

Instead of repeating the full record table why don't we just have a column for the official totals and another for the unofficial totals (or don't include the unofficial totals)?--Jahalive (talk) 17:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We could also combine the two record summary tables by dividing the newspaper decisions between the win and loss columns (that would require a change to the template or not using the template).--Jahalive (talk) 17:44, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]