Talk:George H. Peck

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:25, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

George H. Peck (1856–1940) → George H. Peck — Request to move page back to George H. Peck as the date qualifier is unneeded (no other George Pecks have articles here). Pinkadelica ^♣ 06:57, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Support. There is no other George H. Peck on Wikipedia and it already redirects here anyway. Station1 (talk) 09:24, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The dates are a poor disambiguator, discouraged by guidelines, and in this case there's no need to disambiguate anyway. Andrewa (talk) 14:48, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support per above. PC78 (talk) 19:21, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support I have to agree, date is useless, there is no other George H. Peck in wikipedia so date is absolutely useless --Poohunter (talk) 07:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:

Sadly, this is just reversing a previous and apparently undiscussed series of moves, see [1] [2] for example. Andrewa (talk) 18:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that and tried to undo the move but I can't figure out how to undo it (hence the request). Pinkadelica ^♣ 00:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately an admin is needed to undo the move because there is more than one edit at the redirect. Station1 (talk) 15:00, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Possible speedy close? Any objections to one? Andrewa (talk) 14:38, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.