Talk:Georgia News Network

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

contested deletion[edit]

I created this talk page to go against the proposed deletion of this article, as it is a legit news agency, and a major news agency that is not on Wikipedia, I would appreciate it if work is done to improve this article, especially from other users, please this article is very important for Wikipedia, in listing all major news agencies. Thanks PBASH607 (The One Day Apocalypse) (talk) 03:12, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

claims of importance need to be backed up by significant coverage published in reliable third party sources. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:18, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but a quick question the sources I have here are indeed reliable and not an unreliable third party source like Facebook or likedin, I have put in sources that are from the home page of the Georgia news network. I'm getting confused, I will try my hardest though. Thanks PBASH607 (The One Day Apocalypse) (talk) 03:23, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Third Party Links[edit]

I have added several third party links, and I have improved the page a bit, how much more to go? Thanks PBASH607 (The One Day Apocalypse) (talk) 04:07, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

a lot. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:13, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I have 10 so far, and please stop making me go to that link, if you think there is not enough references, please search it up and put it in, don't ask the creator to search it up himself without any help, please add a reference your self. Remember this article is not mine, it's for the public to improve, stop pretending to behave like an admin and be real bossy ;) Regards PBASH607 (The One Day Apocalypse) (talk) 21:01, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

you have put in a number of external links, but none to reliably published sources. We dont care about just anything that someone happens to put on the web, it has to be from a source with a reputation for fact checking and accuracy. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:09, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm busy do it yourself, I only created this article, if you are so concerned about this, please be my guest and fix them yourself. PBASH607 (The One Day Apocalypse) (talk) 01:36, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've been a bit harsh lately (and busy), I will return to adding better third party references to this article and add an external links section, also a quick question; are you an admin or a casual user?PBASH607 (The One Day Apocalypse) (talk) 21:02, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Georgia News Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:09, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]