Talk:Georgian Wicca

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It amuses me to no small degree when I find content that I authored incorporated into other websites, including this article.--HR Mitchell (talk) 06:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide information about your work and which parts of this article are copied from it, and the copied text will be removed. As it is, most of the text could be removed, anyway, since there is so much unreferenced information. ~PescoSo saywe all 23:30, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The majority of the article is taken from text I authored for the first Georgian website back in 1990, and later adpated for use by the Beaufort House Association. The present version of the Georgian website (ref in article) still contains the majority of it. I have no objections to its inclusion here; it just amuses me. Most of it is based on personal knowledge as an initiate of the 2nd Georgian coven, and admittedly, does not rise to encyclopedic standards. That is not an insurmountable issue, however.--HR Mitchell (talk) 00:00, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Georgian Wicca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:32, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]