Talk:Geovisualization

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

where is the *visualization* for this article???[edit]

Does anyone else find it ironic, and a little sad, that the "Geovisualization" article has no.... visualizations! Come on wikipedians, let's fix this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.184.156 (talk) 13:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

link to Makai Voyager[edit]

I'd like to add a link to Makai Voyager; but it was removed as spam. As with the Avizo and GeoViz links, the Voyager software is a software product aimed at geovisualization. Neither of those products/software are referenced in the text of the article. I'd be happy to contribute an image per the comment above ('where is the *visualization* for this article???'). — Preceding unsigned comment added by John carl anderson (talkcontribs) 07:51, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As an employee of the company it is a conflict of interest to add links to it on Wikipedia. If the software is notable then leave it to somebody else to add it to the article. --Biker Biker (talk) 08:08, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Considering that the link to Avizo's product was added by this user (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Egallois), it doesn't seem like the COI policy is being applied evenly to existing and new contributions. I don't want the Avizo's link removed, however, because I think it's valuable to be able to see the commercial interests in a field; I just wanted to add a few links to show that they are not the *only* commercial interests. Anyhow, as I said before, I'd be happy to contribute a few images to this page if it wouldn't just get removed immediately...John carl anderson (talk) 17:23, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geovisualization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]