Talk:Gerhard Schöpfel/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20070812235409/http://www.luftwaffe.cz/schopfel.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:42, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
This is disappointing that you find the table to be a copyright violation. If you chose to compare the version I set up here with that at Petr's website you would see that I had not, in fact, just copied it verbatim but had augmented the data that he had listed with further information regarding the unit's basing and the pilot's commanding officer. Also, I do not see how this information can be considered copyright. It is like saying the results of a race are copyright to the first person who publishes the information, which is plainly silly. Perhaps I should also have included this weblink: http://aces.safarikovi.org/victories/doc/victories-germany-ww2-1940.pdf which also lists the victories for all the pilots, but in chronological order, rather than by pilot. The same information is presented there and would need to be sorted by pilot to be of relevance - I have done that. Is that a breach of copyright to cite the same information from separate sources? Or are you saying the format I used is indication of copyright-abuse? I'm not sure how I can present such information any other way - should it be in reverse chronological order or in a random pattern. Should I have the type of aircraft first, then the location and then the victory number. I would appreciate your advise on how to do this, as your User page obviously shows you to be an eminent wikipedia editor with far more experience than I have, and it will influence how much use I can be to the foundation going forward Philby NZ (talk) 01:57, 8 October 2016 (UTC)