Talk:German torpedo boat Albatros

German torpedo boat Albatros is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 2, 2020.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 11, 2019	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
October 5, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed
February 26, 2019	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
April 27, 2019	Featured article candidate	Promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 11, 2018. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that despite clear orders to fire only if fired upon, the German torpedo boat Albatros crippled the Norwegian ship Pol III after being rammed, thus firing the first shot of the Norwegian Campaign?
Current status: Featured article

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the German torpedo boat Albatros article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Germany Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Tb Albatross AT2.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:06, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion[edit]

I suggest that a new sentence be added to the end of the initial "Construction and career" section explaining that the Reichsmarine became the Kriegsmarine in 1935. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:00, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nice idea, done. L293D (☎ • ✎) 12:22, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WWII[edit]

I find some of the wording re the Norwegian action to be at once odd and POV in that it implies wrongdoing on the part of the Germans. 'Despite clear orders...to fire only if fired upon...'. I'm sure that had I been in command of the German craft, I would have considered being rammed an innately hostile act and the constructive equivalent of being fired upon.Toyokuni3 (talk) 23:57, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quite honestly, I'm not sure that it was really being rammed, vs. a glancing contact. But one source says rammed...--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:19, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

fate of the wreck[edit]

Is it still rusting where it ran aground, or was it later scrapped? 50.111.3.9 (talk) 13:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

None of my sources mentioned its ultimate fate.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]