Talk:German weather ship Lauenburg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Naming?[edit]

Would it not be better to move this article to something like Lauenburg (German weather ship)? That would fit better with other naming conventions, no? I just followed this link from the mainpage without much experience in the matter, so look forward to hearing why I'm wrong.--Eva bd 20:09, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ships can be a little different, see German battlecruiser Scharnhorst, German battlecruiser Gneisenau. German cruiser Prinz Eugen, etc. Benea 20:42, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I believe it's a WikiProject guideline for ships. Personally, I think it's an suboptimal naming convention. It's OK for ships with a prefix like HMS or USS, but to have to wade through three long words "German weather ship" etc before you get to the actual important bit ("Lauenburg") makes it more unwieldy than the more usual Wikipedia convention of brackets at the end (Lauenburg (German weather ship), as Evadb points out). — Matt Crypto 17:44, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on German weather ship Lauenburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:38, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]