Talk:Gerogery level crossing accident

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Possible new sections[edit]

What about a section about changes to the level crossing pending the construction of the overbridge?

  • Did this level crossing have incandescent or brighter LED lights and were these upgraded to LED?

What about a section about a more ideal design of level crossing that might deal with the situation that a bridge is unaffordable?

Tabletop (talk) 06:09, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The overpass has been built, but after the accident not a lot of changes were done other then the adding of speed humps which got closer together as you got closer to the crossing [can be seen in Google Earth as the humps were painted white], Boomgates were fast tracked (IIRC State Government were going to install boomgates at known black-spots) however LED lights were not used (LED has only been used in the past 4 years but not many crossing in rural areas have these), We are not the ones to say what would have been more affordable design of the crossing unless it came from the State Government or its departments. Bidgee (talk) 06:38, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What about some "Active Advance Warning Signals" located the odd hundred metres from the crossing, and which have a pair of flashing yellow lights which operate when the flashing red lights operate? A new level crossing with lights and booms and hopefully with no design flaws costs about $1m, which is much less than a bridge. Clearly many level crossings are going to remain and not be converted to bridges. Tabletop (talk) 07:07, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that the talk page is really about article improvments not your personal view. The bridge has been built (and has been for sometime) with the Government having it's reasons (One of them is because it's located on a state highway). Bidgee (talk) 07:19, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gerogery level crossing accident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gerogery level crossing accident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:33, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gerogery_level_crossing_accident&oldid=1200971512"