Talk:Get Right

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Get Right Pt. 2 Cover.jpg[edit]

Image:Get Right Pt. 2 Cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Get Right (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.  Wikipedian Sign Language Paine  07:36, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Get Right (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.  Wikipedian Sign Language Paine  07:41, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 June 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by a page mover)  Wikipedian Sign Language Paine  10:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


– Only subject called Get Right that has an article, other than the Counter-Strike player, but no one's seriously going to get confused by that, are they? Unreal7 (talk) 22:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Eventhorizon51 (talk) 02:09, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's the plainest opposition reason I've ever read. Unreal7 (talk) 21:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Chasewc91: A WP:HATNOTE would solve that problem. You don't see the other two articles disambiguated, why should this one? -- Tavix (talk) 23:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as none of the other topics are convincing. SSTflyer 02:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. The other articles are covered by WP:SMALLDETAILS. Dohn joe (talk) 00:27, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Chase. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The song is the only thing with the name "Get Right" with a Wikipedia article, the others have differences in capitalization, spacing, or punctuation. WP:SMALLDETAILS are enough to distinguish between distinct topics. That's one of the reasons we use hatnotes. -- Tavix (talk) 23:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Looking at what's actually on the dab page I'm confident this is the primary topic. Add a hatnote to GetRight if necessary, but I think this comes under SMALLDETAILS. Jenks24 (talk) 17:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - I'm not necessarily convinced by the small details argument myself, but I don't think that even needs to come into the discussion. The song is primary over the two articles GetRight and GeT_RiGhT anyway.  — Amakuru (talk) 07:13, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Small details. Timmyshin (talk) 08:03, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 16 external links on Get Right. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:09, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]