Talk:Getlink

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kent Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

Contradiction[edit]

The article states passenger figures are lower than predicted and than later states there are plenty of passengers for both ferries and the tunnel

What logic could shareholders have offered the tunnels creditors to forgive billions in debt on a tunnel and even worse, what kind of investor would throw money as such a bad idea? GodsTeam

Contradiction Explanation[edit]

The creditors forgave a substantial amount of their debt in exchanage for shares in the company. The debt was pretty much worthless as it could not be repaid, so the creditors received shares which gave them more control and a share from future profits. 184.98.58.36 (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

debt payoff[edit]

The following reference ([1] from the Guardian, and others you can find via "eurotunnel debt" in Google News) suggests an improving situation (about time) which could need a change or two in the start of the article. Linuxlad (talk) 19:06, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Le Shuttle[edit]

Did this company used to be Le Shuttle or was that a differernt channel tunnel operator? Simply south (talk) 10:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know it was simply a brand used for the car and truck trains. Definately not a separate company.Imgaril (talk) 16:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1996 fire article problems[edit]

Hello , could someone look at 1996 Channel Tunnel fire as it has a few issues, -the most suspicious of which is the claim of fitting of a fire suppression system in the HGV wagons - this is complete news to me so confirmation would be appreciated. There's a message on the talk page.Imgaril (talk) 16:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eurotunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090304040145/http://www.railpro.co.uk/issues/pdfs/feb08_interview.pdf to http://www.railpro.co.uk/issues/pdfs/feb08_interview.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:02, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is the logo really a Fair Use logo?[edit]

I suddenly found c:File:Getlink Logo 2017.jpg, except the file extension name, I couldn't see any reason that Commons file is different from our "Fair Use" one. Looked through c:COM:TOO France, I even think that this logo can't be copyrighted within France, but just can be trademarked. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:01, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying the local uploaders here: @The Navigators and HapHaxion:. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:02, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226: I frankly didn't realize that Getlink was French company, and that the French had a generous TOO standard. I have no specific justification for it being non-free, I just sorta assumed since I thought it was British, which has a pretty aggressive TOO standard. I'll downgrade and transfer it to the Commons later today.--The Navigators (talk) 05:58, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Fresque 25 ans Eurotunnel.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:52, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]