Talk:Ghost Town (Kanye West song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LOVI33 (talk · contribs) 18:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Kyle Peake, I'll begin my review now. It's a larger article so it might take me a little longer. LOVI33 18:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lead[edit]

  • Not sure if psychedelic should be labelled as a genre since is refers to specifically the guitar and "sounds." LOVI33 20:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Background and development[edit]

  • First paragraph is really long, maybe split it into a few.

Composition and lyrics[edit]

  • "The track includes" → ""Ghost Town" includes"
  • "Guitar is included" → "A guitar is included" OR "Guitars are included"

Release and recording[edit]

Critical reception[edit]

  • Looks good.

Accolades[edit]

  • This could maybe be a subsection under 'Critical Reception' due it still having reviewers comments
  •  Not done since that is two paragraphs and a table, so is enough for its own section and the comments are from the lists only --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial performance[edit]

  • "Freeee (Ghost Town, Pt. 2" → "Freeee (Ghost Town, Pt. 2)"

Live performances[edit]

  • Looks good.

Appearances in media[edit]

  • Looks good.

Sequel[edit]

  • Looks good.

Credits and personnel[edit]

  • Change 'Credits' subsection to 'Personnel'
  •  Done but should I keep the credits adapted bit though? --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charts[edit]

  • Looks good.

Certifications[edit]

  • Looks good.

See also[edit]

  • Looks good.

Notes[edit]

  • Looks good.

References[edit]

  •  Not done since that is how his name is stylized --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links[edit]

  • Looks good.

Final comments and verdict[edit]

  •  On hold for now. This article is extremely well written, great job! The comments above I'm sure wont take too long. It's great reviewing your articles! LOVI33 20:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • LOVI33 Have responded above, thanks a lot for the comments and I hope this becomes a GA soon. --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Great! Thats a  Pass! LOVI33 12:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]