Talk:Giant wrinkled frog

Controversy

I believe it would be better if we discuss on the issue on "CONTROVERSIES" and come to some sort of conclusion. As per my understanding at present I don't think there is a controversy with this taxa. :)--Karthickbala (talk) 16:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Per wikipedia policies WP:NPOV and WP:OR, editors are not supposed to conclude or make original research here. The dispute has been discussed in Reliable sources and citations have been added and the "controversy" angle supported by the newspaper article. It is still controversial since there are unanswered questions, but this is outside the scope of the Wikipedia article. For instance it is rather odd for an author to find fault with their own earlier paper in the tone given. Authors can and do take back their previous conclusions or modify them on the basis of their new research, but this case does not seem to fit in to that category. Shyamal (talk) 03:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Giant wrinkled frog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627000000/http://www.iucnredlist.org to http://www.iucnredlist.org

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Giant wrinkled frog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.eol.org/taxa/17194885
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080629032408/http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/names.php?year=2001 to http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/names.php?year=2001

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:48, 16 October 2017 (UTC)