Talk:Gibbons v. Ogden

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.

National Archives (inactive)

This article is within the scope of National Archives project, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.National ArchivesWikipedia:WikiProject National ArchivesTemplate:WikiProject National ArchivesNational Archives articles

Untitled[edit]

Can somebody get this to be a stub? I don't know how to create stubs. Tuesday, I don't know when this happened? October maybe? -bibliomaniac15

It would be helpful if you could put in a bit about Johson's concurrence. -NHCoL- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.131.98.169 (talk) 04:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Details Box[edit]

I think this article generalizes the Supreme Court's decision. The judgment of the court was one that leveled barriers between states and it did not establish anything other than interstate transportation (which it viewed as intrinsically connected to flow of goods between states) as falling under the federal commerce power. To state that the "United States v. E.C Knight Co." decision somehow reversed or limited this judgment is incorrect since that later case dealt with new issues that did not arise in this case, such as if manufacturing was distinct from interstate commerce since it is not a flow of goods across borders. Also the court in Gibbons v Ogden stated that the federal commerce power did have specified limits (as mentioned in this article). It just did not define what those limits are.Stamos1981 (talk) 23:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

======================[edit]

Correction: It was John Livingston who issued the license to Ogden, not Robert Livingston and Robert Fulton. Robert licensed John to use steamboats in the New York harbor. John, in turn, licensed Ogden on easy terms because Ogden was making a fuss over this monopoly in the Albany legislature and almost succeeded to having the charter rescinded.

Source: Commodore by Renehan.

Norm

edit:

The Constitutional Law and Politics 8th edition says "Robert Livingston and Robert Fulton were granted by the New york legislature a monopoly on the operation of steamboats in the stat’s waters. They in turn licensed Aaron Ogden to exclusively operate a ferry between New York City and various ports in New Jersey.”

The above is therefore false. John Livingston has nothing to do with this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.250.157.134 (talk) 20:00, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone can spare a few minutes, please put in one of those convenient little details boxes. It would make things a lot easier.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gibbons v. Ogden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029203601/http://www.continuingeducationnj.com/PDFs/Staten%20Island%20NJLTA2.pdf to http://www.continuingeducationnj.com/PDFs/Staten%20Island%20NJLTA2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gibbons v. Ogden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gibbons v. Ogden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306011711/http://www.lawnix.com/cases/gibbons-ogden.html to http://www.lawnix.com/cases/gibbons-ogden.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:25, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]