Talk:Gibralter Hill

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Gibralter Hill is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hill[edit]

You copy paste my work, that you kept edit warring out of the article, into this one, without even saying anything? None of your references call this Gibralter Hill, they call it Gibraltar Hill. According to your source, bonzle.com, there are three hills in question, two of them called Gibraltar, one called Gibralter. How do you reconcile the misspelling with the sources you use? 208.54.4.224 (talk) 03:06, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

sigh! The offical name is Gibralter Hill (by the offical naming body in NSW), I never claimed ownership of your content of the mining, infact I stated where it was from. Bidgee (talk) 03:09, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh yourself!! Why don't you explain why all the sources you're citing spell it with an "a"? 208.54.4.224 (talk) 03:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very likely was misspelt over the years and has never corrected (not the first time it has happened and not the last) but offically it's Gibralter Hill. Bidgee (talk) 03:18, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, on the other article's talk page you said that the other hills were trivial. Now you're starting articles about them? You're really a piece of work, my friend. 208.54.4.224 (talk) 03:14, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the content, this one seems notable and I was stating that it was trivial to have the section of the other hills within an article which was only related by name. Bidgee (talk) 03:18, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you finally looked at the content. Next time, why don't you look at it before you start templating me and edit warring with me and accusing me of disruption, vandalism, and pointiness. If my edits were pointy disruptive vandalism why is it that they constitute essentially this entire article? 208.54.4.224 (talk) 03:21, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]