Talk:Gifts (novel)

Gifts (novel) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 4, 2017. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Gifts (novel) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 May 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the emotional journey of the protagonist in the 2004 Ursula K. Le Guin novel Gifts has been compared to that of Max in the 1963 children's picture book Where the Wild Things Are?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gifts (novel).

Wikipedia

Novels: Fantasy Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Children's literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gifts (novel)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 19:13, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:13, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

Well, this is a beautifully-written article and there's little wrong with it.

Thank you!

The 2 images are correctly licensed.
The number of sources used is perhaps a little on the low side. There are other reviews, such as Telegraph; perhaps these are worth searching for, and a brief mention. * Wired has UKLG mention "my three fantasy novels" and what the publisher wanted her to do with them! Could be usable.

Hmm, I spent quite a while searching for sources, including many of the obscure reviews I've used. I think the issue is that since these are newer volumes, they haven't yet got the scholarly attention of her older books: and scholars are more attracted to Voices, it seems. I've inserted the interview, because that's an interesting tidbit. I'm hesitant to use the telegraph source, because that author is getting basic plot details wrong, and so I'd rather not give him much weight; it adds little, in any case.

Some small details:

~~Lead mentions sharing themes, but not which ones. Perhaps briefly say "themes of eyesight and dreamworlds".~~

I've gone with "dreamworlds and choices", which fits the examples better, I think.

~~"Orrec eventually realizes that his he prefers "making" to unmaking." -> "that his father prefers".~~

It's actually Orrec himself, a typo on my part. Fixed.

~~[Gry] "is depicted as edgy": what does this mean?~~

This is from the source: 'Gry, meanwhile, is characterized as edgy and strong-willed, evidenced in her refusal to use her gift on a hunt". I suspect that he means "edgy" in the traditional sense as tense or on-edge, rather than in the more colloquial sense of being part of a new trend. I do think "edgy" conveys the meaning better than a synonym, which is why I left it there.

~~"Le Guin depiction of greed" -> "Le Guin's".~~

fixed.

~~Perhaps worth wikilinking: altruism.~~

done

Summary[edit]

This is a high-quality article that accurately describes its subject. It is easily up to the required standard for GA and I am delighted to give it that status now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:50, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image size[edit]

@Nikkimaria: I'm a little confused about this edit of yours: is there a reason not to use the image size parameter that I am unaware of? Surely the image looks better at the larger size? Vanamonde (talk) 07:09, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanamonde93: see WP:IMGSIZE and MOS:IMGSIZE. If there's a reason to increase or decrease the size of the image, that should be done using upright scaling rather than fixed px size. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nikkimaria: Fair enough, but the usual scaling parameter does not work in the infobox...Vanamonde (talk) 12:12, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanamonde93: See the last sentence of WP:IMGSIZE - that should work here. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:23, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nikkimaria: Sorry to bother you again: but unless there's something odd with my display, which is possible, neither of the suggested solutions work here. Vanamonde (talk) 12:31, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanamonde93: What's currently in the article works fine for changing size - the problem is you can't make the displayed image bigger than the source, which is only 167x247. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]