Talk:Gilbert Hovey Grosvenor

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gilbert Hovey Grosvenor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100207202914/http://www.loc.gov/rr/mss/text/grosvenr.html to http://www.loc.gov/rr/mss/text/grosvenr.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Changed to better live link LaurentianShield (talk) 02:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gilbert Hovey Grosvenor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120104014618/http://www.ntbg.org/gardens/kampong-history.php to http://www.cosmosclub.org/web/journals/1998/wentzel.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120104014618/http://www.ntbg.org/gardens/kampong-history.php to http://ntbg.org/gardens/kampong-history.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Father of photojournalism?

The claim, citing no evidence, that Grosvenor is 'the father of photojournalism' is shown nowhere in the is article to be anything but hyperbole. He was certainly NG's first full-time employee and enlisted Alexander Graham Bell in consolidating the magazine, and like editors of other publications worldwide, was taking up the emerging technology of halftone reproduction of photographs. The history of photojournalism starts with Fratelli D’Alessandri's pictures of the Papal troops at Anzio in 1862 and the battlefields of Mentana and Monterotondo reproduced in L’Illustration (Paris); or Bruno Braquehais' photographs of the Paris Commune of 1870, or American Edward Spencer and his associate Carlos Díaz Escudero's reportage of the Guerra del Pacífico (1879–82); or Nadar's photo-interview Entretien de M. Nadar avec M. Chevreul, le jour de son centenaire also for the newspaper L’Illustration: Le Journal Illustré, 5 September 5, 1886; and then there is Jacob Riis. To claim Grosvenor is 'the father of photojournalism' is therefore anachronistic and unsupportable. I've removed those claims. Jamesmcardle^(talk) 04:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC)