Talk:Gingalain

King Arthur Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject King Arthur, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of King Arthur, the Arthurian era and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.King ArthurWikipedia:WikiProject King ArthurTemplate:WikiProject King ArthurKing Arthur articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

{{section link||Love interests}} The anchor (Love interests) has been deleted.
{{section link||Intervening adventures}} The anchor (Intervening adventures) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled[edit]

What version is this bit about Bleoberis and King Mark in?--Cúchullain ^t/c 08:09, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The wording seems to suggest this story may have inspired the other similar stories such as Percival and Le Cote Mal Taile, but that seems off given the dating. Is the article supposed to imply that? -- Guest 209.162.56.40 04:17, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It says it's related to those, and perhaps the source of some of them. It's not a source for Percival, but reflects a similar motif popular at the time.--Cúchullain ^t/c 21:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]