Talk:Givat

Untitled[edit]

Hi. Obviously the script needs to be Giv'at (ruling across all names in the disambig list). We have Giv'at Shmuel, Giv'at Ada... No difference here. Thanx, 37.46.40.167 (talk) 10:20, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no "obviously" about it.WP:EN says "The title of an article should generally use the version of the name of the subject which is most common in the English language, as you would find it in reliable sources". So if the English-language sources generally say "Givat Assaf", then that should be the title of the article - though there can certainly be a redirect from Giv'at Assaf. --ColinFine (talk) 18:21, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I agree with ColinFine's opinion, and that is the reason why I used Givat instead of Giv'at when I created the page. It's the same reason why the article about Rome is called "Rome" and not "Roma" Azylber (talk) 14:27, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]