Talk:Gizmodo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rooster Teeth[edit]

can someone add a link to the podcasts page? i dont know how.

its page is here.http://roosterteeth.com/groups/profile.php?id=6123


Blatantly obvious Apply fanboyism[edit]

I think there should be a section regarding the common criticism that Gizmodo has gone from reputable tech site to being an Apple fanboy's wet dream. Just about every article on it for the past few years have been praising Apple endlessly and criticizing everyone else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.116.91.139 (talk)

I'd agree, but unless there are verifiable sources you can't include it in the article. Plus, it'd be pretty difficult to represent it neutrally. --Topperfalkon (talk) 17:45, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First Talk Page Post About Something![edit]

So we've added the #whitenoise section. It looks pretty nice. Feel free to edit anything wonderfully new in, as is your right. If anyone feels like getting rid of it, let us know here, perhaps we can talk. Four tildes now?

Sithishade (talk) 07:13, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let's throw something in there about Bill. He seems like a cool guy that impacted the community like no one's business. - Totallynotbilliswear —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.172.251.54 (talk) 03:03, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy[edit]

Generally when a company has broken laws (as with the iPhone) and caused controversy and disruptions (as with the TVBGone thing), we call that controversy, not coverage. It would be biased to call it anything else. 174.112.18.193 (talk) 01:58, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gizmodo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Univision unloaded the digital properties from Gawker[edit]

https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/08/media/univision-sells-gizmodo/index.html

https://www.thedailybeast.com/deadspin-editor-quits-rails-against-bosses-ive-been-repeatedly-lied-to-and-gaslit

This got very little publicity and affects a lot of articles. I don't feel qualified to edit these articles. StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 16:43, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Cruz?[edit]

Would the citation about Ted Cruz, citing it during the facebook hearings count? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.201.184.88 (talk) 03:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]