Talk:Glenbrook Tunnel (1892)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glenbrook Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:08, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should there be a merge of articles[edit]

@Shy Guy Gunzel, Dave Rave, and Kerry Raymond: Hi, hope all is well. I just noticed Glenbrook Deviation 1892 while editing Lapstone Zig Zag. The text between Glenbrook Tunnel and Glenbrook Deviation 1892 contains some similarities and yet some differences. Do any of you know if the deviation is the same as the tunnel, or part thereof; so that they should be merged into the one article? Stay safe and well. Cheers Rangasyd (talk) 11:57, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

you could elaborate the deviation as a separate project which incorporates the tunnel as an entitiy within the project, could be a paragraph within but also left alone. Dave Rave (talk) 23:31, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
on the same line as the zig zag is not a stone arch bridge, but it incorporates the Knapsack Viaduct Dave Rave (talk)

The land owners, and rights to water[edit]

Are there aqua ducks close by. 49.186.235.103 (talk) 07:35, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]